Study of the negative consequences of comprehensive cadastral works: from optimization to complication (on the example of the Tyumen region)
Journal: INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL
Rubrics: LAND RELATIONS AND LAND MANAGEMENT
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 165
to 170
Status:
Received:
13.04.2026
Accepted:
13.04.2026
Published:
15.04.2026
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
land use conflict, forest fund lands, boundaries of populated areas, state forest register, «forest amnesty», cadastral registration
Abstract:
This article examines the causes of land use conflicts arising from the overlap of rural settlement boundaries with forest lands and assesses mechanisms for their resolution. Using the Tyumen Region as an example, a combination of methods is applied: a comparative geographic analysis of data from the Unified State Register of Real Estate (USRRE) and the State Forest Register (SFR), a cartographic analysis of the overlaps, and statistical data processing. It is established that the key cause of the conflicts is the historically established organizational differences between the two independent registration systems, exacerbated by the lack of mandatory approval procedures. Systemic discrepancies in area are identified, and typical situations where settlement boundaries overlap are analyzed. It is shown that Federal Law No. 280-FZ («Forest Amnesty») is a necessary, but still insufficient, tool for addressing the root cause – the disunity between the registers. A scheme for interaction between Rosreestr and forestry authorities aimed at synchronizing data is developed and visualized. The practical significance of this work lies in its proposal of specific measures for the priority cadastral registration of the boundaries of municipalities and forestry areas, which is a prerequisite for sustainable land management and the prevention of similar conflicts in the future.
This article examines the causes of land use conflicts arising from the overlap of rural settlement boundaries with forest lands and assesses mechanisms for their resolution. Using the Tyumen Region as an example, a combination of methods is applied: a comparative geographic analysis of data from the Unified State Register of Real Estate (USRRE) and the State Forest Register (SFR), a cartographic analysis of the overlaps, and statistical data processing. It is established that the key cause of the conflicts is the historically established organizational differences between the two independent registration systems, exacerbated by the lack of mandatory approval procedures. Systemic discrepancies in area are identified, and typical situations where settlement boundaries overlap are analyzed. It is shown that Federal Law No. 280-FZ («Forest Amnesty») is a necessary, but still insufficient, tool for addressing the root cause – the disunity between the registers. A scheme for interaction between Rosreestr and forestry authorities aimed at synchronizing data is developed and visualized. The practical significance of this work lies in its proposal of specific measures for the priority cadastral registration of the boundaries of municipalities and forestry areas, which is a prerequisite for sustainable land management and the prevention of similar conflicts in the future.
Keywords:
land use conflict, forest fund lands, boundaries of populated areas, state forest register, «forest amnesty», cadastral registration
land use conflict, forest fund lands, boundaries of populated areas, state forest register, «forest amnesty», cadastral registration
