The prevalence of public interest over private one is a fundamental principle of the Russian legislation. The institution of seizure of land plots in favour of the state provides for mandatory confirmation of the expediency and necessity of this measure. The owners consider that the amount of compensation is not enough and the estimate examination often raises reasonable doubts about objectivity thereof. The duration of litigation is accompanied by financial costs for all participants in the process. This article is devoted to the study of the stages of the procedure for seizure of land plots for state or municipal needs. It considers the legal framework governing initiation of such a procedure and establishes the conditions for the legality of the government bodies’ actions. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of case law revealing gaps in the current legislation causing the emergence of conflict situations between land owners and government agencies. We provide specific cases of litigation illustrating the challenges in the implementation of legal norms and demonstrate the importance of compliance with legal procedures and taking into account the interests of owners when implementing land seizure measures in this article.
iz'yatie zemel'nyh uchastkov, razmer vozmescheniya, cenoobrazuyuschie faktory, sudebnaya praktika, osparivanie, vid razreshennogo ispol'zovaniya, ocenka rynochnoy stoimosti
1. Apelyacionnoe opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda № 33-2413/2024 ot 09.04.2024g. (UID: 78RS0001-01-2023-000002-45) po delu № 2-2699/2023 // Konsul'tant Plyus: spravochnaya pravovaya sistema. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 13.05.2025).
2. Bokan' V.A. Problemy opredeleniya osnovaniy iz'yatiya zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya nuzhd stroitel'stva avtomobil'nyh dorog // Transportnoe pravo i bezopasnost'. 2023. № 4 (48). S. 11-18.
3. Vlasov V.A. Otdel'nye pravovye aspekty iz'yatiya zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federacii / V.A. Vlasov, Yu.S. Semin // Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo. 2020. № 9 (189). S. 64-68.
4. Gamanyuk N.G. Dostovernost' ekspertnyh ocenok zemel'nyh uchastkov // V sbornike: Mestnoe samoupravlenie v sisteme publichnoy vlasti. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. 2015. S. 59-60.
5. Gamanyuk N.G. Metodika vybora effektivnyh resheniy v zadache ocenki zemel'nyh uchastkov // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2017. № 5 (69). S. 153-156.
6. Gribovskiy S.V. Ocenka stoimosti nedvizhimosti // uchebnoe posobie : uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov, obuchayuschihsya po special'nosti "Finansy i kredit" / Moskva, 2009.
7. Denisov S.Yu. K voprosu o problemah zaschity prav sobstvennikov pri iz'yatii zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd / S.Yu. Denisov, K.A. Stepanov // Voprosy rossiyskoy yusticii. 2023. № 27. S. 360-365.
8. Kleymenova E.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie iz'yatiya (vykupa) zemel'nogo uchastka dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd // avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskih nauk // Institut gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Orel, 2008.
9. Kochetov P.S. Problemy teorii i praktiki iz'yatiya i osvobozhdeniya zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd / P.S. Kochetov, A.V. Ahmatov // Predstavitel'naya vlast' - XXI vek: zakonodatel'stvo, kommentarii, problemy. 2012. № 5-6 (116-117). S. 63-70.
10. Kuznecov V.I. Ocenka razmera ubytkov pri iz'yatii zemel'nogo uchastka dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd // Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2006. № 9 (60). S. 57-61.
11. Mel'nikov N. Iz'yatie (vykup) zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd // Hozyaystvo i pravo. 2009. № 10 (393). S. 106-109.
12. Mkrtchyan E.S. Problemy pravoprimeneniya praktiki pri iz'yatii zemel'nogo uchastka dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd // Voprosy rossiyskoy yusticii. 2022. № 20. S. 374-380.
13. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda goroda Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoy oblasti ot 05.02.2025 № A56-86541/2023 // Elektronnoe pravosudie: internet-portal. – URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/.
14. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 17 avgusta 2022 g. № A41-25948/22 // Elektronnoe pravosudie: internet-portal. – URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru.
15. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Ryazanskoy oblasti ot 12 sentyabrya 2023 g. № A54-1090/2023 // Elektronnoe pravosudie: internet-portal. – URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/.
16. Schurov N.N. Sovershenstvovanie metodov ocenki rynochnoy stoimosti zemel'nyh uchastkov pri iz'yatii dlya gosudarstvennyh ili municipal'nyh nuzhd // avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata ekonomicheskih nauk / Finansovyy universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federacii. Moskva, 2011.
