Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 338.436
The article presents the results of a study of the factors hindering the development of digital technologies in the agricultural sector, which is currently undergoing a digital revolution. The aim of the study is to identify barriers to digitalization of the activities of small agricultural producers. At the first stage of the study, based on a review of scientific literature, the factors perceived by scientists and market participants as the most significant obstacles to the introduction of digital technologies were identified. The differences in barriers typical for the markets of countries at the initial stage of digitalization of the agricultural sector and countries with a high level of digitalization are identified. Taking into account the identified barriers, a questionnaire was developed and a survey was conducted in the form of a personal interview of heads of farms and households in the Penza region and the Republic of Crimea, and the activities of two agricultural organizations were also studied. It has been revealed that the barriers of digitalization perceived by small agricultural producers in our country correspond to the typical profile of barriers typical for developing countries. The identified barriers were ranked in descending order of perception frequency: the cost of digitalization; risks of cost recovery; lack of supply of digital technologies in the local market; insufficient qualifications of employees; infrastructure problems; insufficient awareness of technologies. The links between the individual characteristics of the surveyed farms, the use of digital technologies and the perception of barriers to digitalization were also studied. It is concluded that the high cost of digital technologies is perceived as a barrier more often by farms that do not use debt financing; the lack of information about the possibilities of digital technologies is associated with the lack of elements of "smart" agriculture in the economy. Measures are proposed to overcome the identified barriers, including through the use of agricultural consumer cooperation.
small agricultural producers, digital technologies, barriers to digitalization, farms, digitalization of agriculture, agricultural cooperation
1. Kitole, F.A., Mkuna, E., Sesabo, J.K. (2024). Digitalization and agricultural transformation in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Tanzania agriculture sector. Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100379
2. Baumüller, H., Ikpi, U., Jumpah, E.T., Kamau, G., Kergna, A.O., Mose, L., Nientao, A., Omari, R., Phillip, D., Salasya, B. (2023). Building digital bridges in African value chains: Exploring linkages between ICT use and social capital in agricultural marketing. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.03.010
3. Yang, Ch., Ji, X., Cheng, Ch., Liao, Sh., Obuobi, B., Zhang, Y. (2024). Digital economy empowers sustainable agriculture: Implications for farmers’ adoption of ecological agricultural technologies. Ecological Indicators, vol. 159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111723
4. Cheng, Ch., Gao, Q., Ju, K., Ma, Yu. (2024). How digital skills affect farmers’ agricultural entrepreneurship? An explanation from factor availability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 9, iss. 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100477
5. Abiri, R., Rizan, N., Balasundram, S.K., Shahbazi, A.B., Abdul-Hamid, H. (2023). Application of digital technologies for ensuring agricultural productivity. Heliyon, vol. 9, iss. 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22601
6. Cimino, A., Coniglio, I.M., Corvello, V., Longo, F., Sagawa, Ju.K., Solina, V. (2024). Exploring small farmers behavioral intention to adopt digital platforms for sustainable and successful agricultural ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123436
7. Dibbern, T., Romani, L.A.S., Massruha, S.M. (2024). Main drivers and barriers to the adoption of Digital Agriculture technologies. Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100459
8. Munz, J., Maurmann, I., Schuele, H., Doluschitz, R. (2024). Digital transformation at what cost? A case study from Germany estimating the adoption potential of precision farming technologies under different scenarios. Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100585
9. Sidorova O.E. Bespilotnye cifrovye instrumenty v razvitii sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii: znachenie, preimuschestva i bar'ery razvitiya // Menedzhment v APK. 2022. № 4. S. 54-59. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/https://www.elibrary.ru/fcfswa
10. Chowdhury, A., Kabir, K.H., McQuire, M., Bureau, D.P. (2025). The dynamics of digital technology adoption in rainbow trout aquaculture: Exploring multi-stakeholder perceptions in Ontario using Q methodology and the theory of planned behavior. Aquaculture, vol. 594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741460
11. Geppert, F., Krachunova, Ts., Mouratiadou, I., Nuell Ju., Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. (2024). Digital and smart technologies to enhance biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of opportunities and challenges for broader adoption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100444
12. Sun, Y., Miao, Y., Xie, Zh., Wu, R. (2024). Drivers and barriers to digital transformation in agriculture: An evolutionary game analysis based on the experience of China. Agricultural Systems, vol. 221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104136
13. Costa, F., Frecassetti, S., Rossini, M., Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2023). Industry 4.0 digital technologies enhancing sustainability: Applications and barriers from the agricultural industry in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137208
14. Silveira, F., Silva, S.L.C., Machado, F.M., Barbedo, J.G.A., Amaral, F.G. (2023). Farmers' perception of the barriers that hinder the implementation of agriculture 4.0. Agricultural Systems, vol. 208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103656
15. Hackfort, S. (2023). Unlocking sustainability? The power of corporate lock-ins and how they shape digital agriculture in Germany. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103065
16. Tabe-Ojong, M.P.Jr., Salama, Y., Abay, K.A., Abdelaziz, F., Zaccari, C., Akramkhanov, A., Menza, G., Anarbekov, O. (2024). Harnessing digital innovations for climate action and market access: Opportunities and constraints in the CWANA region. Global Food Security, vol. 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100763
17. Engas, K.G., Raja, J.Z., Neufang, I.F. (2023). Decoding technological frames: An exploratory study of access to and meaningful engagement with digital technologies in agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122405
18. Choruma, D.J., Dirwai, T.L., Mutenje, M.J., Mustafa, M., Chimonyo, V.G.P., Jacobs-Mata, I., Mabhaudhi, T. (2024). Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, vol. 18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286
19. Dibirov A.A. Rol' cifrovizacii v razvitii APK i sel'skih territoriy regiona // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2022. № 11. S. 37-45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/https://www.elibrary.ru/llwukj
20. Koterov A.N., Ushenkova L.N., Zubenkova E.S., Kalinina M.V., Biryukov A.P., Lastochkina E.M., Molodcova D.V., Vaynson A.A. Sila svyazi. Soobschenie 2. Gradacii velichiny korrelyacii // Medicinskaya radiologiya i radiacionnaya bezopasnost'. 2019. T. 64. № 6. S. 12-24. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/https://www.elibrary.ru/daeyng
