Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 332.33
The research is aimed at establishing the state of the problem of forming a system of forecasting and land use planning, including as an institution of land management in general, forming the basis for further research in the field of regional land use, identifying the main trends and views. Methodology and methods: an expert Internet survey was conducted. Results and scope of application: A database of almost two hundred professional experts in the field of land management, land use, planning and forecasting of land use, working in the higher education system, scientific organizations, enterprises and institutions, including those with scientific publications on the subject of research over the past 5 years, has been formed. Based on the results of processing the questionnaires, a unified expert opinion was formed that the lack of forecasting and planning of land use in Russia can lead to negative consequences in the management of land resources at the regional and federal levels, as well as irrational use and land degradation. The overwhelming majority of experts believe that there is no system for forecasting and planning land use at the federal and regional levels, or it is under construction. Experts consider the main thing in industry forecasts to be a scientifically based assessment of the national economic demand for industry products and to determine the most effective ways to achieve it. The question of what should be the main sources of information for the functioning of a modern system of forecasting and land use planning has not found an identical opinion among experts and requires a more detailed assessment. Experts agree on the need to recreate a single body in the land management system. The results obtained indicate that it is extremely necessary to create an integrated information aggregation system based on data from the unified state register of lands and territorial planning data.
land use, planning, land use planning, land use forecasting, expert survey, questionnaire, land management, land use trends
1. Abuali A.M.A., Yah'ya M.Ya.M. Stanovlenie ekologicheskogo podhoda v prostranstvennom planirovanii // Organizator proizvodstva. 2022. T. 30. № 1. S. 24-35.
2. Babich N.S., Batykov I.V. Internet-oprosy obschestvennogo mneniya kak instrument sbora dannyh dlya prinyatiya pravovyh resheniy // Sociologiya i pravo. 2020. №3 (49). S. 25-33.
3. Batunova E.Yu., Gun'ko M.S., Medvedev A.A. Neupravlyaemoe prostranstvo: planirovanie i politika v usloviyah depopulyacii v Ivanovskoy oblasti // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2021. T. 66. № 3. S. 440-459.
4. Borodin S.N. Model' ocenki ustoychivogo razvitiya regiona na osnove indeksnogo metoda // Ekonomika regiona. 2023. T. 19. № 1. S. 45-59.
5. Varlamov A.A. Regional'nye sistemy zemlepol'zovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Zemleustroitel'noe obrazovanie i nauka: iz XVIII v XXI vek: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo foruma, posvyaschennogo 240-letiyu so dnya osnovaniya Gosudarstvennogo universiteta po zemleustroystvu, Moskva, 27 maya 2019 g. T. 1. M.: Gosudarstvennyy universitet po zemleustroystvu, 2019. S. 65-73.
6. Velasko G., Popper R., Mayls Y. Pogruzhenie v kreativnoe buduschee kak osnova dlya razrabotki rekomendaciy v ramkah poiskovyh scenariev // Forsayt. 2021. T. 15. № 2. S. 25-38.
7. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B. Nekotorye konceptual'nye osnovy ispol'zovaniya professional'nyh ekspertnyh soobschestv // Voprosy upravleniya. 2020. № 2 (63). S. 6-12.
8. Dolzhenko S.B., Dolzhenko R.A., Harchenko V.S., Nazarov A.V. Deyatel'nost' professional'nyh ekspertnyh soobschestv: osobennosti motivacii uchastnikov i ocenka ih vovlechennosti // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2021. № 5 (165). S. 345-373.
9. Dubovickiy A.A., Klimentova E.A. Gotovnost' k biologizacii kak sub'ektivnyy faktor formirovaniya ustoychivyh sistem zemlepol'zovaniya // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2022. № 6 (221). S. 68-77.
10. Ivchenkova M.S. Specifika, rol' i metodologicheskie problemy ekspertnogo znaniya v sociologicheskom issledovanii // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sociologiya. Politologiya. 2022. T. 22. № 4. S. 424-429.
11. Komarov S.I., Rasskazova A.A. Prognozirovanie i planirovanie ispol'zovaniya zemel'nyh resursov i ob'ektov nedvizhimosti: uchebnik. 1-e izd. M.: Yurayt, 2020. 298 s.
12. Meteleva E.R. Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti po strategirovaniyu social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya v regione posredstvom ukrepleniya vzaimosvyazi prognozirovaniya i strategicheskogo planirovaniya // Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2021. T. 31. № 3. S. 285-295.
13. Novoselov A.S., Faleev A.V. Sravnitel'nyy analiz social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya gorodov-millionnikov // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2021. T. 14. № 12. S. 1829-1839.
14. Hlystun V.N. Zemel'naya politika v kontekste ustoychivogo razvitiya // Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie. 2021. T. 16. № 4 (61). S. 208-215.
15. Rossiyskiy Nauchnyy Fond (RNF): oficial'nyy sayt. Moskva, 2024. URL: https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-01413/ (data obrascheniya: 01.02.2024).
