Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 332.1
UDC 338.432
The research is motivated by the need to enhance the efficiency of agricultural production in the BRICS+ countries and to ensure their long-term food security amid demographic imbalances, ecological and climatic shifts, and the depletion of natural resource bases. The objective of the study is to identify the evolutionary trajectories of agricultural productivity in the BRICS+ economies, to determine the drivers of differentiation, and to forecast food-security scenarios for the grouping. The analysis employs economic and mathematical methods using panel data from the World Bank for the period 2000–2025. Composite indices of Agricultural Productivity (API) and Agricultural Input Intensity (AII) were constructed using min–max normalization. The methodological toolkit includes Principal Component Analysis (PCA), panel regressions with fixed effects, Holt–Winters exponential smoothing with a damped trend, the Granger causality test, and VAR modelling. PCA reduced the dimensionality of the dataset and isolated two principal components explaining 74.58 percent of the total variance. Cluster analysis revealed four profiles of agricultural systems: highly productive desert economies (UAE, Saudi Arabia), resource-intensive continental giants (India, Brazil), moderately intensive systems (China, Egypt, Iran, Russia), and lagging agricultural economies (Ethiopia, South Africa). Econometric modelling detected β-convergence in API with a coefficient of –0.2391 and a half-life of 2.90 years. For labour productivity per worker the coefficient reached –0.6282 with a half-life of 1.10 years. Irrigated land area (influence coefficient 0.42 in the random-forest model), fertilizer consumption (0.31), and water productivity (0.27) were identified as the key determinants of efficiency. The Holt–Winters forecast to 2031, with extrapolation to 2050, indicates an increase in the average API to 0.44–0.52 under the continuation of current trends. The findings can be used to support strategies for technological cooperation, the creation of a joint agrotechnology transfer facility, and the formation of strategic food reserves, ensuring food security for an estimated 4.8–5.2 billion people by the mid-twenty-first century.
resource potential, BRICS+, resource intensity index, technological convergence
1. Redchikova N.A., Fomina Yu.A. Podderzhka agrarnogo sektora stran BRIKS: suschestvuyuschaya praktika i vozmozhnye perspektivy // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 1. S. 102-116.
2. Fomina Yu.A., Redchikova N.A. Agrarnye rynki stran BRIKS: usloviya sovmestnogo innovacionnogo razvitiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 391. S. 176-182.
3. Fomina Yu.A., Redchikova N.A. A. Agrarnyy sektor stran BRIKS: problemy i vozmozhnosti dlya razvitiya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. 2015. № 1. S. 150-155.
4. Sal'nikova O.V., Rozhkova L.V. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa stran BRIKS // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obschestvennye nauki. 2020. № 4. S. 159-168.
5. Rastopchina Yu.L., Kovaleva E.I., Vaganova O.V. Vzaimodeystvie stran BRIKS v sfere APK: obzor i analiz eksportnoy deyatel'nosti // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya. 2025. № 2. S. 18-31.
6. Tolmachev M.N. Teoreticheskie i empiricheskie podhody k konvergencii sel'skohozyaystvennogo proizvodstva // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 1. S. 193-199.
7. Wang T., Wu J., Liu J. Regional Differences, Dynamic Evolution, and Convergence of Global Agricultural Energy Efficiency // Agriculture. 2024. No. 8. P. 1429.
8. Chiarella C., Meyfroidt P., Abeygunawardane D. et al. Balancing the trade-offs between land productivity, labor productivity and labor intensity // Ambio. 2023. Vol. 52. P. 1618-1634.
9. Soldatenkova O.I. Vliyanie rasshireniya sostava BRIKS na mirovuyu torgovlyu sel'skohozyaystvennymi tovarami // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2024. № 4. S. 384-393.
10. Egbo O.P., Ezeaku H.C., Okolo V.O. et al. Enhancing agricultural and industrial productivity through freshwater withdrawals and management: implications for the BRICS countries // Environmental Development and Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 25. P. 3771-3799.
11. Nesterenko M.A., Dement'eva A.A. Teoreticheskie aspekty razvitiya bioekonomiki i otraslevoy konvergencii v sel'skom hozyaystve // Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. № 11. S. 293-301.
12. Zinchenko N.V., Marachkova G.A. Innovacionnyy menedzhment i novye podhody k upravleniyu proektnoy deyatel'nost'yu v sel'skom hozyaystve // Vestnik Akademii znaniy. 2024. № 3. S. 765-772.
13. Sayfetdinov A.R. Ekonomicheskaya suschnost' i osobennosti ocenki prioritetov suverennogo innovacionnogo razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2025. № 2. S. 203-208.
14. Rodionov D.G., Dmitriev N.D., Aguzarova F.S. Analiz sel'skohozyaystvennyh komponentov resursnogo potenciala stran EAES s ispol'zovaniem ekonomiko-matematicheskih metodov // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2025. № 4. S. 538-544.
15. Dmitriev N.D., Rodionov D.G., Aguzarova L.A. Dinamika sel'skohozyaystvennogo potenciala Rossii v usloviyah povysheniya intensivnosti proizvodstva: statisticheskiy analiz // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2025. № 3. S. 322-328.
16. Timofeeva N.S., Chimitdorzhieva E.C., Imeskenova E.G., Mahanova O.V., Itygilova E.Yu., Vanchikova E.N. Issledovanie osnovnyh tendenciy razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva regiona s primeneniem metodov matematicheskogo modelirovaniya // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2022. № 6. S. 603-608.
17. Dmitriev N.D., Zaycev A.A., Sitohova T.E. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost' kak sostavnoy element v sisteme rentnogo regulirovaniya resursnogo potenciala social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2025. № 2. S. 239-244.
18. Anischenko A.N., Lyasnikov N.V., Romanova Yu.A. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy material'no-tehnicheskogo obespecheniya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa dlya bolee polnogo ispol'zovaniya ego proizvodstvennogo potenciala i vozmozhnosti obespecheniya prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti strany v celom // Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost'. 2021. № 4. S. 345-360.
19. Sikandar F., Erokhin V., Wang H., Rehman S., Ivolga A. The Impact of Foreign Capital Inflows on Agriculture Development and Poverty Reduction: Panel Data Analysis for Developing Countries // Sustainability. 2021. No. 6. P. 3242.
20. Lukina S.G., Sadykov A.A., Fayzullin R.V. Modeli optimizacii v sisteme SCM: progressivnoe upravlenie cepyami postavok // Vestnik universiteta. 2023. № 8. S. 116-127.
21. Aleksandrovich Yu.E., Rodionov D.G., Eremina I.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya instrumentov politiki importozamescheniya dlya ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennosti v sankcionnoy srede // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2025. № 4. S. 372-387.
22. Budagov A.S., Trofimova N.N. Cifrovizaciya v vysokotehnologichnyh otraslyah promyshlennosti: problemy, perspektivy i strategii razvitiya // Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2024. № 12. S. 49-57.
23. Jiaduo E., Kibria M.G., Aspy N.N., Ullah E., Hossain M.E. The Impact of Agricultural Employment and Technological Innovation on the Environment: Evidence from BRICS Nations Considering a Novel Environmental Sustainability Indicator // Sustainability. 2023. No. 20. P. 15083.
