Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 338.242
This article presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of biotechnology implementation issues into the Russian economy and studies conducted by foreign and domestic scientists. The research findings suggest that there is a need for systematic state policy, more effective scientific monitoring, and increased public awareness about key characteristics of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and organic agricultural products. The study's objective was to identify trends in developing a culture of conscious consumption among young Russians (Generation Z) based on consumer expectations and preferences regarding the use of GMO or organic agrarian products. Research outcomes: formalized online surveys and focus group sessions with Generation Z representatives led to the following conclusions: Russian youth generally demonstrate openness towards new technologies and have positive attitudes toward organic products while emphasizing the importance of complete information and reliable scientific data concerning the safety of GMO-based foods. Major concerns were identified related to their impact on health and ecology, lack of exhaustive information causing consumer distrust. The authors highlight the necessity of enhanced control from governmental bodies such as FAS over the accuracy of advertisements and marketing communications provided by producers and retailers of agricultural goods to prevent misinformation and fraudulent practices. One crucial direction involves engaging young people in discussions on healthy eating habits through social networks, participating in joint scientific projects with research institutes and food manufacturers aimed at fostering responsible and science-based attitudes towards innovative technologies within the agro-industrial complex. Within the framework of developing integrated sustainable models of agriculture combining advantages of both GMO and organic production methods, it is proposed to shift focus onto individual and societal values held by Generation Z.
genetically modified organisms, organic products, generation Z, consumer behavior, culture of conscious consumption
1. Gvasaliya K. D., Do Hyong Kuen. Geneticheski modificirovannye produkty: novye vozmozhnosti i riski // Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 2015. № 11-2. S. 21-24.
2. Yuricin A.E. Prodovol'stvennaya i sel'skohozyaystvennaya organizaciya OON (FAO): naznachenie i osnovnye principy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Universiteta «Klaster». 2022. № 7(7). S. 46-54.
3. Tamlander T., Seisto A. European Generation Z Attitudes Toward Cellular Agriculture and Future Orientation in Sustainability. 25th Futures Conference of Futures of Technologies. 2025. URL: http://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/european-generation-z-attitudes-toward-cellular-agriculture-and-f/ (data obrascheniya: 09.08.2025).
4. Bhutto M.Y. et al. Factors affecting repurchase intention of organic food among generation Z (Evidence from developing economy) // PLoS ONE. 2023. Vol. 18. № 3: e0281527. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281527
5. Molitorisová A. et al. New genomic techniques in organic production: Considerations for science-based, effective, and acceptable EU regulation // Cell Reports Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 2. No 6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100405
6. Trávníček J. et al. The World of Organic Agriculture 2024: Summary // The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2024. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM – Organics International, 2024. Pp. 20-31. URL: http://orgprints.org/id/eprint/52272/1/1747-organic-world-2024_light.pdf (data obrascheniya: 09.08.2025).
7. Matić S. The Genetics and Molecular Biology of Pathogens in Agricultural Crops // Agronomy. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 6. P. 1088. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061088
8. Gupta S., Saubhari Y., Kumar S. How genetically modified food impacts our world: a closer look at GM crops // International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 2024. Vol. 5. No. 3. Pp. 6279-6283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0324.0866
9. Ngongolo K., Mmbando G.S. Necessities, Environmental Impact, and Ecological Sustainability of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops // Discover Agriculture. 2025. Vol. 3. No.1. P. 29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00180-0
10. Peterson G. et al. The Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops: A Multidisciplinary Perspective // Conservation Ecology. 2000. Vol. 4. No.1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00195-040113
11. Nawaz M.A. et al. GMOs, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes // GMOs: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecological Processes. – Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. Pp. 3-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_1
12. Kirpichnikov M.P., Kudryavcev A.M. Bezopasnoe ispol'zovanie geneticheskih tehnologiy // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2022. T. 92, № 5. S. 407-412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587322050048
13. The Current State of Innovative Development of Agriculture in Russia / O.S. Akupiyan, D.P. Kravchenko, N.I. Chovgan [et al.] // E3S Web of Conferences. 2024. Vol. 537 (08022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453708022
14. Makeev V.Yu. «Lyudyam vse ravno, otredaktirovano ih plat'e ili net»: zaveduyuschiy laboratoriey sistemnoy biologii IOGen RAN – o vmeshatel'stve v genom rasteniy [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. 2021. URL: http://www.ras.ru/digest/showdnews.aspx?id=33d6b25f-e6a8-450a-958d-ef18b3c31cc1&;print=1 (data obrascheniya: 09.08.2025).
15. Bondarenko V.A., Gasparyan A.V., Gasparyan R.A. Issledovanie otnosheniya molodogo naseleniya Rossii k geneticheski modificirovannym organizmam (GMO) i produktam na ih osnove // Prakticheskiy marketing. 2025. № 3. S. 43-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-3762-2025-3333-43-47
